`RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00925
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) and Reentry (RE) codes be
changed to allow reentry into the Air Force.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was depressed in basic training due to the passing of her
mother so soon after her fathers death.
She desires to once again serve as a member of the Air Force. She
has a great attitude and wants to protect and help those in
leadership to execute the mission of fly, fight and win. She
maintains a love and passion for the Air Force and yearns to
fulfill her dreams of becoming an Airman.
In support of her request, the applicant submits a copy of a
medical recommendation, dated 18 Feb 2014 signed by a civilian
Licensed Clinical Psychologist.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Nov 12.
On 13 Dec 12, the Medical Operations Squadron diagnosed the
applicant with an adjustment disorder and depressed mood. They
noted the members diagnosis did not meet retention standards for
continued military service and recommended she be administratively
separated.
On 19 Dec 12, the commander notified the applicant of his intent
to separate her for a mental disorder in accordance with AFPD 36-
32, Military Retirements and Separations and AFI 36-3208,
Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section 5B,
paragraph 5.11.9. The applicant waived her right to consult
counsel and to submit statements. The discharge authority
concurred with the commanders recommendation and approved an
entry level separation.
On 28 Dec 12, the applicant was furnished an Uncharacterized
discharge, and was credited with 1 month and 23 days of active
service.
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects a Separation Code: JFY,
Reentry Code: 2C, and Narrative Reason for Separation:
Adjustment Disorder.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AETC/SGPS finds no evidence of an error or an injustice. They
can support her request to reenter the Air Force if she does not
require any treatment or counseling for 3 years and receives a
favorable mental health evaluation.
A complete copy of the HQ AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or an injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the
applicants master personnel record, the discharge to include the
SPD code, the narrative reason for separation and character of
service was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge instruction and within the
discretion of the discharge authority.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or an injustice. The RE Code 2C is required based on the
entry level separation with an uncharacterized character of
service. The applicants request to change the RE code to any
other would circumvent screening of SGPSs recommended conditions.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit E.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit F). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-00925 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, HQ AETC/SGPS, dated 21 Mar 14.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 4 Apr 14.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 May 14.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00785
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial indicating that based on the documentation on file and subsequent civilian examination the recommendation for separation was done in accordance with established policy and procedures. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01503
The reason for this action was a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Nov 13, that found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist; specifically, that the applicant had anemia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial as it pertains to the applicants medical diagnosis,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03479
On 10 Aug 07, she was discharged with a narrative reason for separation of Erroneous entry (other) and a RE code of 2C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants requests to change her separation and RE codes. It has been seven years since she was discharged from the service and she did not provide a reason why the application was not submitted within three years of her discharge. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00970
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 10 Jan 13, his commander recommended he be given an entry level discharge for mental disorders under...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicants military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02261
On 24 Apr 2008, the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation and an uncharacterized character of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of JFW which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 4C RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01601 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.) be corrected to an eligible reentry code for reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03351
Based upon the physicians findings, the applicant was notified by her commander of his intent to recommend her for an uncharacterized entry-level separation based on fraudulent entry, under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15 under Basis for Discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be...